<style>button,.story-clue{pointer-events:none}button{opacity:.55}.story-clue{pointer-events:auto}.panel-select{opacity:1}#app-status{display:none}</style>
A MATHEMATICAL ADVENTURE FOR CURIOUS MINDS

A small why. A big adventure.

Follow the story. Try a proof. Let curiosity choose how deep you go.

No account. No API key. Just curiosity.

Two ways in. One table between them.

I'd rather not fight math today

Walk in through the manga: seventeen chapters, sixty-four pocket pebbles, zero required formulas. The Lean source stays behind glass until you ask for it.

Straight to the mathematics

Begin at the proof map — thousands of named theorems — then climb the full ladder from clock inverses to R = T. The story keeps telling itself beside you; it will keep you honest.

Made for company: one reader who loves math and one who does not — one sofa. Whatever each of you finds carries over to the tea salon.

Start with “I don’t know yet.”

Seventeen chapters, one extraordinary argument. One small discovery is enough for today.

17 chapters · StoryOriginal source ↗

Pip’s rule: mistakes are clues. Every chapter is open, and every question allows another try.

Modularity, the 3–5 trick, and compatible pieces.

Choose your depthStart with the intuition.
Explore the whole proof29,511 theorems · original statements · dependencies

Search the local catalogue in English or Japanese. Major landmarks have Japanese titles. Open the full original proof on GitHub for the complete context.

Your discovery in this chapter

Understand the plan for proving modularity before exploring the tools that make it work.

Fingerprint
A simpler piece of arithmetic information that can be compared.
Lifting
Recover richer structure from reduced information, using a theorem with hypotheses.
Where the metaphor ends

Concert admission represents modularity. The theorem applies to nonsingular semistable integral models with specified hypotheses, not automatically to every equation someone calls a curve.

</>S_WeierstrassCurve_modularity_of_semistableModel.lean
Original source ↗ · L165–180Pinned revision aa2d8b3
theorem modularity_of_semistableModel' (W : WeierstrassCurve ℤ) (hΔ : W.Δ ≠ 0)
(hW : W.IsSemistableModel) : (W.map (Int.castRingHom ℚ)).IsModular := by
by_cases h3 : W.ModRepIsIrreducible 3
·
obtain ⟨M₃, hM₃, hres₃, hcube₃, hns₃⟩ :=
isResiduallyModular_three_and_noInertiaFixedTorsion_and_not_cube_dvd_of_isSemistableModel W hΔ hW h3
haveI : NeZero M₃ := ⟨hM₃.ne'⟩
exact isModular_map_of_mlc1
(liftingAtConductor_three_of_level_hns 3 rfl W hΔ hW h3 M₃ hres₃ hns₃ hcube₃)
·
have h5 : W.ModRepIsIrreducible 5 := (modThreeOrFiveIrreducible W hΔ hW).resolve_left h3
obtain ⟨W', hΔ', hW', h3', hcong⟩ := threeFiveSwitchCurve W hΔ hW h5

👩🏻‍🎨 Mika · Source reading guide

The target is a curve’s modular partner. We first compare arithmetic data in the simpler world of remainders. A lifting theorem can then recover the fuller match, provided its conditions hold. The proof tries the prime three first, and uses five and a helper curve if that route is blocked.

Annotated original · not a live Lean state

Point to a story clue or a highlighted term to connect the two.

Try this logical move →
Source and verification details

Source: anthropics/fermats-last-theorem @ aa2d8b3. Upstream reports verification; this reader has not independently rebuilt the project. Manga explanations are not formal proofs.

Source license & attribution
Chapter 9/17 · Story

Two doors to the concert

The concert has strict entry rules. Pip has brought a kazoo.

How we got here

The duet introduced what modularity means. Now we examine a strategy for establishing it: start with suitable residual information and use a lifting theorem when its hypotheses hold.

These links explain the reading route. A story analogy is not a proof of this theorem.

Take it to the tea salon
MIKA
“A theorem supplies a helper curve with the right conditions. The next chapters explain that detour.”
An auxiliary visitor

Story → proofThe helper’s passport represents precise properties promised by an existence theorem. It cannot be any replacement curve.

Find a suitable helperthreeFiveSwitchCurve

The idea behind the story

The target is a curve’s modular partner. We first compare arithmetic data in the simpler world of remainders. A lifting theorem can then recover the fuller match, provided its conditions hold. The proof tries the prime three first, and uses five and a helper curve if that route is blocked.

What helps you enter a difficult proof?

  • Knowing the job of each tool before learning all its details.
  • Memorizing every unfamiliar word first.

The story and source are readable here. Enable JavaScript to edit proofs, try quizzes, and explore the interactive map.

First we need a small modular fingerprint. Langlands–Tunnell provides the crucial starting point at three.

Read. Try. Make it click.

  1. Read the manga and choose Story, Math, or Lean depth.
  2. Open the proof playground. Edit the tactics and watch the goals change.
  3. Select a state, term, or hint. Wrong turns are part of the story.

The playground checks a small propositional language. FLT excerpts are editable reading material, not live-checked Lean proofs. The complete FLT build remains an upstream verification report.

I’m lost · Help

Mika’s help desk

Two doors to the concert

One thing at a time

Start with the cake-scale story. You only need to read one small piece at a time. If you are in the Fermat story, start with Story depth, then the words listed before the chapter.

In simpler words

You do not need to know Lean, symbols or university mathematics to begin. Definitions come first in the small stories.

A small clue

Look at the small example before the general formula. Ask what changed and what stayed the same.

Close this panel to return to the exact place you were reading. These are prepared hints for this page.

Start with the first small story →